![]() ![]() ![]() It works quite well for polynomial splines, although there may be a wee bit of mathematics required to choose the coefficients of these functions.Īnother way to create this function is as an explicit piecewise polynomial. ![]() My point in all of this is I've described a simple beginning point to form any piecewise function. There are also piecewise cubic functions that are only C1 functions. Splines in particular often have specified orders of continuity, so for example, a cubic spline will be twice differentiable (C2) across the breaks. A spline is a piecewise function, carefully tied together at a list of knots or break points. Really, this is where we might be leading. Se that I've called this construct a spline again. More sophisticated splines are easily generated from this beginning. Finally, the third piece adds in another offset in above x = 1. Then we add in a piece that takes effect above zero. The first term is what happens for x below the first break point. Our piecewise function is now derived from H(x). For example, how might one define the piecewise function that returns -1 when x = 0) For example, suppose you wished to define a function that took on three different values depending on what interval the point fell in? While this can be done too with creative use of tests, carefully shifting and scaling them, it can get nasty. Yes, the inline function took wildly more time to execute than did the anonymous form.Ī problem with the simple piecewise constant form I've used here is it is difficult to expand to when you have more break points. I would strongly recommend use of the anonymous form. constfun = (x > 0.5)*2 - 1 Īn inline function does a similar thing, but inline functions are VERY slow compared to an anonymous function. By scaling and translating that result, it is easy to generate a function that does what you wish. Thus the test (x > 0.5) returns a constant, either 0 or 1. The simple way to define a piecewise constant function like yours is to use a logical operator. So then just define a piecewise function with ONE break point, at x = 0.5. If you absolutely know that you will never evaluate the function outside of, then there is no problem. I might also have used the term knot, another common word in the world of splines.) (By the way, I've used the term "break" here, because we are really defining a simple form of spline, a piecewise constant spline. However, you have not defined the value of the function outside of the breaks. You really have defined a piecewise function with three break points, i.e., at. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |